Showing posts with label William Froug. Show all posts
Showing posts with label William Froug. Show all posts

Wednesday, 27 July 2016

Book review: Screenwriting Tricks of the Trade

I remember reading Screenwriting Tricks of the Trade by William Froug for the first time years ago, and quoting part of it at a screenwriter's meeting. It was the first book I'd come across which explicitly highlighted the failures of the Three-Act Theory, and I was delighted. Rereading it now, I'm more impressed than ever. 

William Froug is an Emmy award-winning American television writer and producer. Shows he worked on include: The Twilight Zone, Gilligan's Island, Bewitched, The Dick Powell Show, Charlie's Angels, and The New Twilight Zone.

He has also written numerous books on screenwriting, including Screenwriting Tricks of the Trade, Zen and the Art of Screenwriting (I and II), The Screenwriter Looks at the Screenwriter and How I Escaped from Gilligan's Island.

This is a book worth buying, reading and rereading. What follows are some selected quotes:
  • My method is simple. See movies, as many as possible, and take from each one the important lessons that each has to offer.
  • I never see a film without analyzing the story structure, the core conflict, the line of action and counter-action, the opening signal, the theme, the protagonist, the antagonist, and so on.
  • Some screenwriters will think about a story for years before committing it to paper.
  • If you can write one really terrific scene per day, you are doing very well, indeed. Sometimes a single scene will take several days to work out properly.
  • Don't place yourself on self-imposed deadlines.
  • The secret of success as a screenwriter is simple: Keep the seat of your pants to the seat of your chair.
  • Work out as many of the story problems that you can before you begin to write. Otherwise, you might very well fall into the writer's worst trap, writing in circles...
  • A dramatic story is any series of events having vivid, emotional, conflicting, striking interest or results.
  • It doesn't matter one bit how often your story has been told before; you must retell it better, with a fresh and different approach. If you can do that, your story will seem like the newest idea ever presented.
  • When you tell an old story in a new way, it becomes a new story.
  • Old stories never die, they often merely improve with the retelling.
  • Character is story and story is character; they are each by-products of the other.
  • I have found character to be the single best story-source for drama.
  • The most popular game in Hollywood is recycling. Hardly a meeting goes on without beginning or diverting into discussions of what qualities previous movies had that made them winners.
  • If you hope to participate in these professional story conferences, you'd damn well better be film literate.
  • In order to create viable art that will hold someone's attention, you must have dramatic tension. Which, in screenwriting, is created by a line of action and opposing forces.
  • Tension = Attention.
  • Great screenplays have a single line of action and equally powerful opposing forces. 
  • Your protagonist does not have to be likeable.
  • What you must create is a protagonist who is fascinating, compelling, interesting, and understandable. 
  • Scorsese is often called "America's greatest director" on the strength of a body of work in which all the characters in his movies are various degrees of wicked and miserable people. 
  • Watching villainy lets people vent their rage in a harmless way.
  • Unless the threat is deadly serious, it's a joke and your protagonist will be ridiculed.
  • Try to avoid static locations such as offices, hotel rooms, park benches— any place where you are apt to have two or more characters sitting around talking to each other.
  • If, on the other hand, the scene must be played in a room, make certain it has a strong emotional dynamic, that something important is being talked about, and that there is tension or conflict between the talkers.
  • What works best in scenes is what works best in stories—a strong element of surprise.
  • In building your scene, do not tell us where we have been or where we are going next.
  • Avoid entrances and exits.
  • Scenes will play and write better if each character in your scene has a single goal or purpose for this particular scene.
  • Every character must have an attitude to make the scene play.
  • Look for the subtext in every scene—what's really going on as opposed to what appears to be going on.
  • Creating new and fresh scenes is one of the most important aspects of becoming a successful screenwriter. For this reason, I have lost my infatuation with Syd Field's paradigm.
  • If you like formulas, buy Syd's book Screenplay. It will help some writers and hinder others.
  • I know Syd Field and respect him; we served on the Writers Guild Academic Liaison Committee together, and I think his contribution to understanding story structure is an important one. But, like all formulas, his tends to wear itself out with repeated use.
  • The great American movies usually defy formula writing.
  • I attended a seminar on "Film & Literature." One of the panelists remarked, surprisingly, that all movies are told in three acts, to which fellow-panelist screenwriter William Goldman remarked wryly, "Really, I didn't know that."
  • The reality is that there are no clearly defined "Acts" in screenplays. An "Act" is whatever you choose to say it is.
  • When you structure your movie, there is no one-size-fits-all.
  • Modern moviegoers are annoyed when you show or tell them something they have already figured out for themselves. Trust your audiences; they are not as dumb as the cynics would have you believe.
  • An outline might be helpful but most certainly is not necessary for all screenwriters. Again, no one-size-fits-all guideline applies.
  • The best way to tell your story is the way the story itself dictates. Do not try to contort it into a predetermined form.
  • The idea that all screenplays are written in three "acts" is nonsense. The truth is many screenplays use five acts, six acts, two acts, or any number of large, developmental story sections. 
  • Avoid rigidity, it is the death of creativity.
  • It is helpful to know your theme before you begin to write, though it is not absolutely necessary, but you had better know it before you finish the screenplay.
  • A theme is simply a proposition leading to a conclusion.
  • Some call the theme a premise or a thesis. It does not matter what you call it, but you cannot write an outstanding screenplay without knowing what it is about. 
  • Many screenwriters complete their screenplays without ever knowing what they're about. The result is, almost invariably, an empty and unsuccessful piece of work.
  • There is more than one theme in a good movie; there are often many minor themes running concurrently, but there is only one major theme.
  • Frank Pierson told an important story about the need to find the theme or "take" on your protagonist before you write your screenplay. Frank had accepted a contract to write what he later titled Dog Day Afternoon, but he simply could not figure out what his protagonist was all about. He finally decided (the Al Pacino character) was a man trying to make everybody happy in all circumstances. 
  • The theme of this excellent movie is, If you try to please all the people all the time, you are doomed to failure.
  • One minute per page is average playing time for a movie. However, this can vary as much as twenty or thirty minutes for a two hour film, depending on the pace of the director.
  • A story must be underway on page one; something is happening or about to happen.
  • You do not need to set up your protagonist; your protagonist must "set up" himself or herself by his or her behavior and by the circumstances in which we discover him or her. Nothing more needs to be said.
  • Actors can say more with an exchange of glances than all your wordiness can convey. Trust the actors. I do not mean you should trust them as writers—far from it. Trust them to deliver much more than you ever expected from their first performance. Like it or not, if you are determined to be a dramatist, actors will be your lifetime collaborators.
  • What your audience does not know but wants to know is an excellent device to hold their attention.
  • The way people actually talk to each other and movie dialogue have nothing in common. Your job as a dramatist is to create the illusion of real dialogue. It is easy only if you work very hard at it, edit yourself carefully, rewrite it endlessly, polish it, until the characters say only what must be said and nothing else.
  • Write what you truly believe in, what excites you, what you care about—the kind of movie you would pay money to see. That's the formula.

First posted:  1 October 2012
 

Wednesday, 29 April 2015

Don't get it right, get it written

Some advice for aspiring screenwriters:
The secret of screenwriting success is simply this: Don't get it right, get it written.  Art Arthur
So many people drop out after a few classes. Most people never finish a screenplay. I impress on my students to finish in the time allotted. There are a lot of perfectionists out there who kinda circle around and around and research and read books and study—and they never really finish screenplays. What I took away from my teachers was they made me finish scripts.  Kris Young, UCLA
Butch Cassidy
I don’t know what it means, a perfect story. I think you just wanna basically try to figure out the story, and stay in the story as long as you can and as closely as you can, and end it. I think when you start telling yourself, “I wanna write a perfect thing,” all you’re gonna do is castrate yourself, and get into deeper and deeper trouble. It’s hard to do anyway. It’s no fun going into your pit every day and trying to figure out how to get two or three or five pages. Some days you don’t do anything. Then if you have two crappy days in a row, you’re really in deep shit. You just wanna get it done, and you pray someone will like it.   – William Goldman
Toy Story 3
The first draft is nothing more than a starting point, so be wrong as fast as you can.  Andrew Stanton
Actually finishing it is what I’m gonna put in as step one. You may laugh at this, but it’s true. I have so many friends who have written two-thirds of a screenplay, and then re-written it for about three years. Finishing a screenplay is first of all truly difficult, and secondly really liberating. Even if it’s not perfect, even if you know you’re gonna have to go back into it, type to the end. You have to have a little closure.   Joss Whedon
Once you start writing your screenplay, the most important advice I can possibly give you is to keep going. Do not go back and make revisions under any circumstances. Once started, press on like there's a pack of wolves nipping at your ass.  William Froug

First posted:  11 October 2011

Tuesday, 10 September 2013

William Froug: 1922-2013

William Froug, 91, has passed away. He worked as a radio playwright, short story writer, screenwriter, and teacher of screenwriting.

Born in Brooklyn, New York,
he was adopted by a family in Little Rock, Arkansas, graduated from the University of Missouri, before enlisting in the U.S. Navy in 1943.

He is an Emmy award-winning American television writer and producer. Shows he worked on include: The Twilight Zone, Gilligan's Island, Bewitched, The Dick Powell Show, Charlie's Angels, and The New Twilight Zone.

Froug has also written numerous books on screenwriting, including Screenwriting Tricks of the Trade, Zen and the Art of Screenwriting (I and II), The Screenwriter Looks at the Screenwriter and How I Escaped from Gilligan's Island.

Froug founded the writing program at UCLA film school, and finished his teaching career with screenwriting workshops from 1994-1995 at Florida State University's film conservatory.

Read a review of Screenwriting Tricks of the Trade here.



 

Monday, 1 October 2012

Book review: Screenwriting Tricks of the Trade

I remember reading Screenwriting Tricks of the Trade by William Froug for the first time years ago, and quoting part of it at a screenwriter's meeting. It was the first book I'd come across which explicitly highlighted the failures of the Three-Act Theory, and I was delighted. Rereading it now, I'm more impressed than ever. 

William Froug is an Emmy award-winning American television writer and producer. Shows he worked on include: The Twilight Zone, Gilligan's Island, Bewitched, The Dick Powell Show, Charlie's Angels, and The New Twilight Zone.

He has also written numerous books on screenwriting, including Screenwriting Tricks of the Trade, Zen and the Art of Screenwriting (I and II), The Screenwriter Looks at the Screenwriter and How I Escaped from Gilligan's Island.

This is a book worth buying, reading and rereading. What follows are some selected quotes:
  • My method is simple. See movies, as many as possible, and take from each one the important lessons that each has to offer.
  • I never see a film without analyzing the story structure, the core conflict, the line of action and counter-action, the opening signal, the theme, the protagonist, the antagonist, and so on.
  • Some screenwriters will think about a story for years before committing it to paper.
  • If you can write one really terrific scene per day, you are doing very well, indeed. Sometimes a single scene will take several days to work out properly.
  • Don't place yourself on self-imposed deadlines.
  • The secret of success as a screenwriter is simple: Keep the seat of your pants to the seat of your chair.
  • Work out as many of the story problems that you can before you begin to write. Otherwise, you might very well fall into the writer's worst trap, writing in circles...
  • A dramatic story is any series of events having vivid, emotional, conflicting, striking interest or results.
  • It doesn't matter one bit how often your story has been told before; you must retell it better, with a fresh and different approach. If you can do that, your story will seem like the newest idea ever presented.
  • When you tell an old story in a new way, it becomes a new story.
  • Old stories never die, they often merely improve with the retelling.
  • Character is story and story is character; they are each by-products of the other.
  • I have found character to be the single best story-source for drama.
  • The most popular game in Hollywood is recycling. Hardly a meeting goes on without beginning or diverting into discussions of what qualities previous movies had that made them winners.
  • If you hope to participate in these professional story conferences, you'd damn well better be film literate.
  • In order to create viable art that will hold someone's attention, you must have dramatic tension. Which, in screenwriting, is created by a line of action and opposing forces.
  • Tension = Attention.
  • Great screenplays have a single line of action and equally powerful opposing forces. 
  • Your protagonist does not have to be likeable.
  • What you must create is a protagonist who is fascinating, compelling, interesting, and understandable. 
  • Scorsese is often called "America's greatest director" on the strength of a body of work in which all the characters in his movies are various degrees of wicked and miserable people. 
  • Watching villainy lets people vent their rage in a harmless way.
  • Unless the threat is deadly serious, it's a joke and your protagonist will be ridiculed.
  • Try to avoid static locations such as offices, hotel rooms, park benches— any place where you are apt to have two or more characters sitting around talking to each other.
  • If, on the other hand, the scene must be played in a room, make certain it has a strong emotional dynamic, that something important is being talked about, and that there is tension or conflict between the talkers.
  • What works best in scenes is what works best in stories—a strong element of surprise.
  • In building your scene, do not tell us where we have been or where we are going next.
  • Avoid entrances and exits.
  • Scenes will play and write better if each character in your scene has a single goal or purpose for this particular scene.
  • Every character must have an attitude to make the scene play.
  • Look for the subtext in every scene—what's really going on as opposed to what appears to be going on.
  • Creating new and fresh scenes is one of the most important aspects of becoming a successful screenwriter. For this reason, I have lost my infatuation with Syd Field's paradigm.
  • If you like formulas, buy Syd's book Screenplay. It will help some writers and hinder others.
  • I know Syd Field and respect him; we served on the Writers Guild Academic Liaison Committee together, and I think his contribution to understanding story structure is an important one. But, like all formulas, his tends to wear itself out with repeated use.
  • The great American movies usually defy formula writing.
  • I attended a seminar on "Film & Literature." One of the panelists remarked, surprisingly, that all movies are told in three acts, to which fellow-panelist screenwriter William Goldman remarked wryly, "Really, I didn't know that."
  • The reality is that there are no clearly defined "Acts" in screenplays. An "Act" is whatever you choose to say it is.
  • When you structure your movie, there is no one-size-fits-all.
  • Modern moviegoers are annoyed when you show or tell them something they have already figured out for themselves. Trust your audiences; they are not as dumb as the cynics would have you believe.
  • An outline might be helpful but most certainly is not necessary for all screenwriters. Again, no one-size-fits-all guideline applies.
  • The best way to tell your story is the way the story itself dictates. Do not try to contort it into a predetermined form.
  • The idea that all screenplays are written in three "acts" is nonsense. The truth is many screenplays use five acts, six acts, two acts, or any number of large, developmental story sections. 
  • Avoid rigidity, it is the death of creativity.
  • It is helpful to know your theme before you begin to write, though it is not absolutely necessary, but you had better know it before you finish the screenplay.
  • A theme is simply a proposition leading to a conclusion.
  • Some call the theme a premise or a thesis. It does not matter what you call it, but you cannot write an outstanding screenplay without knowing what it is about. 
  • Many screenwriters complete their screenplays without ever knowing what they're about. The result is, almost invariably, an empty and unsuccessful piece of work.
  • There is more than one theme in a good movie; there are often many minor themes running concurrently, but there is only one major theme.
  • Frank Pierson told an important story about the need to find the theme or "take" on your protagonist before you write your screenplay. Frank had accepted a contract to write what he later titled Dog Day Afternoon, but he simply could not figure out what his protagonist was all about. He finally decided (the Al Pacino character) was a man trying to make everybody happy in all circumstances. 
  • The theme of this excellent movie is, If you try to please all the people all the time, you are doomed to failure.
  • One minute per page is average playing time for a movie. However, this can vary as much as twenty or thirty minutes for a two hour film, depending on the pace of the director.
  • A story must be underway on page one; something is happening or about to happen.
  • You do not need to set up your protagonist; your protagonist must "set up" himself or herself by his or her behavior and by the circumstances in which we discover him or her. Nothing more needs to be said.
  • Actors can say more with an exchange of glances than all your wordiness can convey. Trust the actors. I do not mean you should trust them as writers—far from it. Trust them to deliver much more than you ever expected from their first performance. Like it or not, if you are determined to be a dramatist, actors will be your lifetime collaborators.
  • What your audience does not know but wants to know is an excellent device to hold their attention.
  • The way people actually talk to each other and movie dialogue have nothing in common. Your job as a dramatist is to create the illusion of real dialogue. It is easy only if you work very hard at it, edit yourself carefully, rewrite it endlessly, polish it, until the characters say only what must be said and nothing else.
  • Write what you truly believe in, what excites you, what you care about—the kind of movie you would pay money to see. That's the formula.

Wednesday, 1 August 2012

Ninety Reasons to Keep Going

It's been a year for screenwriters turning ninety. Back in February, I was supposed to interview Stewart Stern, the writer of Rebel Without a Cause (and many other great movies), but he was busy teaching and traveling. Then he turned 90 years of age (DOB: March 22, 1922), and the whole thing got lost in traffic.

For those who don't know, Stewart Stern is descended from the two families (Zukor and Loewe) who, in the beginning, controlled the Paramount and MGM studios. As a child he made up part of the household audience for impromptu entertainments by dinner guests, such as Charlie Chaplin and Douglas Fairbanks. At College he studied Play Writing with Marion Galloway, who had taught Tennessee Williams.


He went from College to the Army (notably fighting in the Battle of the Bulge), to being Missing In Action, to working as an actor in New York. Then he took up writing. 

Stewart Stern with Brian McDonald, the screenwriting teacher.
Most famously, he wrote the screenplays for Rebel Without A Cause and The Ugly American. He also wrote the screenplay for Teresa (Academy Award nomination), Rachel, Rachel (Academy Award nomination), The Ugly American, The Last Movie, and the Oscar-winning documentary Benjy. In addition to being twice nominated for an Academy Award, Stern has won a Writers Guild Award (nominated four times), an Emmy (A Christmas to Remember), and a Peabody (Sybil). 

The point is that the guy is ninety years old and still going strong. Take a look at the following home movie, shot by Roddy McDowell at Malibu in 1965. It shows Stewart Stern with Christopher Plummer, Sal Mineo, Natalie Wood, Juliet Mills, Tuesday Weld, Jack Warden, and others.

Stewart Stern first appears 13 seconds into the film. He is the guy on the right, with the black T-shirt, receding hair line and dark hair, who laughs at the sight of the camera. (Don't turn up the volume, there is no sound.



Our second ninety-year-old is William Froug. I was working on a review of his book, Screenwriting Tricks of the Trade, when I realised that he, too, had turned 90 years of age this year (DOB: May 26, 1922).

William Froug was born in Brooklyn, New York, adopted by a family in Little Rock, Arkansas, graduated from the University of Missouri, before enlisting in the U.S. Navy in 1943.

He is an Emmy award-winning American television writer and producer. Shows he worked on include: The Twilight Zone, Gilligan's Island, Bewitched, The Dick Powell Show, Charlie's Angels, and The New Twilight Zone.

Froug has also written numerous books on screenwriting, including Screenwriting Tricks of the Trade, Zen and the Art of Screenwriting (I and II), The Screenwriter Looks at the Screenwriter and How I Escaped from Gilligan's Island.

Froug founded the writing program at UCLA film school, and finished his teaching career with screenwriting workshops from 1994-1995 at Florida State University's film conservatory.
 
< 
Norman Lear
Norman Lear also turned 90 years of age this year (DOB: July 27, 1922). 

Lear is an American television writer and producer, who created TV shows such as All in the Family and The Jeffersons, and produced movies like Stand By Me and The Princess Bride

He was born in New Haven, Connecticut, studied at Emerson College in Boston, but dropped out in 1942 to join the United States Army Air Forces as a radio operator/gunner on B-17 Flying Fortress bombers. He flew 52 combat missions before being discharged in 1945. 

Lear moved to California, where he pretended to be a reporter interviewing Danny Thomas, got Thomas’ phone number, and pitched him a routine about Yiddish words that had no English counterparts. Thomas wound up using the sketch, giving Lear his big break. He wrote for shows such as The Colgate Comedy Hour, The Martha Raye Show, The Tennessee Ernie Ford Show, The Andy Williams Show, and All in the Family, before moving on to producing movies. 

Here's a clip of Norman Lear talking about how he got started as a writer.


Our fourth ninety-year-old is Carl Reiner (DOB: March 20, 1922). He was born in the Bronx, New York, and served with an entertainment unit during World War II, where he was often on the same bill as Glenn Miller

In 1949 he entered television, working on what would become Sid Caesar's Your Show of Shows, where he acted and wrote comedy with Mel Brooks. In 1961, he developed the sitcom The Dick Van Dyke Show  
 
Carl Reiner
Among his many movie roles, he played Glenn Ford's annoying neighbor in The Gazebo, the girl's father in Gidget Goes Hawaiian, the only un-panicked person in The Russians Are Coming, The Russians Are Coming, and the oldest con man in Ocean's Eleven, Twelve, and Thirteen with George Clooney and Brad Pitt    

He had a long and successful run as a screenwriter and director, writing and directing The Comic, Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid, and The Man with Two Brains. He directed Where's Poppa?, Oh God!, The One and Only, The Jerk, and All of Me   

Reiner has won five Emmys; two for Caesar's Hour, two for The Dick Van Dyke Show, and one for a guest appearance on Mad About You  
 

Saturday, 29 October 2011

Three-act structure?

It was laid out for the general public in Syd Field's book Screenplay and, like most aspiring screenwriters, I ran into three-act theory early on.

To be honest, I couldn't see it at all. 

I read Linda Seger's book, Making a Good Script Great, which repeats Field's demand that a screenplay consist of 120 pages, divided into thirty pages of act 1, sixty pages of act 2, and thirty pages of act 3. 

Then she talked about a Midpoint, which divides act 2 into 2A and 2B. I thought, "Doesn't that make for a four-act structure?"  But things got worse, because the Midpoint scene can be stretched out into a sequence or, dare I say it, an Act in its own right, giving us a five act structure.

Oh, and by the way, don't most of Shakespeare's plays consist of five acts? 

An opening frame from the Irish movie, The Actors.
Some movies publish the fact that they were designed as a five-act play. One such is the Michael Caine movie, The Actors (2006). [Good movie, a personal favourite. Check it out.] The fact is explicitly stated on a screen which says, A Film In Five Acts... Then each act is introduced with its own title card.

Click on this page
In the old days, movies were written with an explicit five-act structure. You don't need to be some kind of genius to know that; it was shown clearly on the page. If you look at the scripts of some of the great movies from the 1940s and '50s, such as Double Indemnity (1944) or Sunset Blvd. (1950), you will see that the scenes aren't numbered 1, 2, 3, etc., but rather A-1, A-2, A-3, and so on. A=Act 1. The scenes in Act 2 are numbered B-1, B-2, B-3, etc. And on and on up to scenes numbered E-1, E-2, E-3, etc.

'A' to 'E', that's FIVE acts. (I've included a page sample from Double Indemnity to the right,)

To this day, both Final Draft and Movie Magic Screenwriter have the capacity to label scenes with that same alpha-numeric designation. 

In addition to these complications, there are also the made-for-television movies, known as "Movie Of the Week" (MOW) in the US. They consist of seven acts (the commercial breaks are written into the screenplay). 

The bulk of the gurus tramping the I'll-teach-you-how-to-to-write-a-hit-movie circuit (who have, themselves, never written a hit movie) talk about three-act structure. Occasionally you will come across a commentator who tells a different story. One such is John Truby. In his book, The Anatomy of Story: 22 Steps to Becoming a Master Storyteller, he says: 
"... three act structure, albeit a lot easier to understand than Aristotle, is hopelessly simplistic and in many ways just plain wrong. ... Three-act structure is a mechanical device superimposed on the story and has nothing to do with its internal logicwhere the story should or should not go."
Another is William Froug. Read his book Screenwriting Tricks of the Trade. He says:
It is not valuable to recommend that new screenwriters write by the numbers.
He goes on to tell the following story.
I attended a seminar of "Film and Literature" at Key West this past winter. One of the panelists remarked, surprisingly, that all movie stories are told in three acts, to which fellow-panelist screenwriter William Goldman replied, "Really? I didn't know that." I began to think of three of Goldman's best screenplays: Marathon Man (based on his novel), A Bridge Too Far, and Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. None of them follow the conventional three act structure.
William Froug adds a quote from Daniel Pyne, writer of numerous TV shows and feature films:
I completely eschew the formula of first, second, and third acts. I've run into too many writers who get lost in that old formula. They know where the first act ends, and they know where the second act ends, but their entire script is treading water because they're just writing from point to point.
Howard Suber well said: With regard to any specific movie, everyone will agree on where the first act begins and where the third act ends, but there is often no agreement about where the second act begins and endseven among the people who make the film.

In his book Hollywood Animal, Joe Eszterhas explains how he wrote the movie Basic Instinct
I had written ... movies where men manipulated the women who loved them. I thought it would be fun to flip the dynamic: to do a movie about a man being manipulated by a woman who is brilliant, omnisexual and evil. ... The piece wrote itself. I improvised all the way through. I made no notes for myself, no outline. I simply put the things down which the characters said to me. Three weeks from the time I started thinking about it, I finished the piece.
Basic Instinct is not structured with three acts. Instead it is a narrative punctuated by reference to books: the one Catherine wrote describing the murder; the one she wrote about the boy killing his parents "to see if he could get away with it"; the one she is writing, which when finished results in her telling Nick it's all over; and the one Nick says he's writing, with its impossibly happy ending, which will guarantee his eventual demise at Catherine's hands.

There are those who claim that a film must have a three-act structure, and they often claim that Aristotle gave this "rule" to us. In fact, there were no acts as we define the term today in Greek drama, and Aristotle did not talk about acts at all because the plays he analyzed were all presented in a single continuous performance.
The three-act structure that so many people ascribe to Aristotle was, in fact, invented more than two thousand years later when Ibsen and other nineteenth-century dramatists found that their audiencesunlike the drama groupies of Periclean Athens—were unable to sit still for the entire duration of a full-length play.
A movie has to start somewhere, go somewhere, and eventually finish. As Jean-Luc Goddard famously said, A film should have a beginning, a middle and an end. But not necessarily in that order. Structure is necessary and good, but beware of approaching it from a fixed POV. 

Jokes have structure, but only one rule: the punchline comes last. The rest can be told in whatever order suits you, but once the punchline appears anywhere but at the end, it stops being a joke and becomes something else. One of the best illustrations of this fact is the documentary The Aristocrats (2005), which consists of a hundred comedians telling just one joke. They tell it in a hundred different ways, but the punchline stays the same, and it always comes at the end. (I have to warn you it should be R-rated for the language.) 

I think every wannabe screenwriter should study the various theories of structure until they understand them, then they should set it all aside and focus on writing their story the best way they can. The problem with embracing three-act structure as an article of faith is that you end up being able to see only what you expect to see, rather than what's actually there, and you may find yourself artificially imposing a structure on your story that won't do it justice.

Monday, 24 October 2011

Larceny vs Inspiration

In his excellent book, Acting in Film, Michael Caine says this about acting:
When becoming a character, you have to steal.  Steal whatever you see. You can even steal from other actors' characterizations; but if you do, only steal from the best. If you see Vivian Leigh do something, or Marlon Brando, or Robert de Niro or Meryl Streep do something that fits your character, steal it. Because what you're seeing them do, they stole.
In the Time magazine article, 10 Questions for Woody Allen, on January 28, 2008, Woody Allen said this:
I've stolen from the best. I've stolen from Bergman. I've stolen from Groucho, from Chaplin, from Keaton, from Martha Graham, from Fellini.       I mean I'm a shameless thief.
Austin Kleon
In the famous post, How to Steal Like an Artist, on his eponymous blog, Austin Kleon says this:
Here's what artists understand. It's a three-word sentence that fills me with hope every time I read it. Nothing is original. It says it right there in the Bible. Ecclesiastes: That which has been is what will be, That which is done is what will be done, And there is nothing new under the sun.
It doesn't matter one bit how often your story has been told before; you must retell it better, with a fresh and different approach. When you tell an old story in a new way, it becomes a new story.
Michael Ferris said this in Script magazine on August 30, 2011:
When Travis Beacham (Clash of the Titans, Pacific Rim) was just an aspiring writer, he ... said to me “there’s no such thing as an original story – to approach writing a new script thinking you’re going to write a story that’s unique and original and No One Else Has Ever Seen is a fool’s errand. Man has been writing for thousands of years – every story that will ever be told has been done.”
I (sent) out his script The Gloaming to my contacts in order to try to help him sell it.  The script was getting immediate and overwhelmingly positive reaction, and people were calling it “creative,” “inventive,” “amazing,” etc. it looked like he was going to get a great manager, agent, and soon – a sale. After a couple months, it had a new title courtesy of Arnold Kopelson (Killing on Carnival Row) and was sold to New Line Cinema.
Now, this script was a steampunk fantasy about a city with fairies, werewolves, etc., and a human detective who is trying to find and catch a serial killer who is terrorizing the Fairy Quarter. It was a startling, exciting, unique storyworld, and instantly captured people’s attention. People were falling over themselves to call it “fresh” and “original,” but here’s the thing – the story is basically The Fugitive. Travis took the story and structure of The Fugitive, and put it in a freaky, cool, interesting, unique world with suitably unique matching dialogue and characters.
He was hailed as original, not because he was reinventing the wheel when it came to story, but because he took a simple story, and gave it interesting, complex, unique layers.
Austin Kleon wrote another post called 25 Quotes to Help You Steal Like an Artist. I stole a few of them for here:
A good poet will usually borrow from authors remote in time, or alien in language, or diverse in interest.  — T.S.Eliot
Every idea is a juxtaposition. That’s it. A juxtaposition of existing concepts. Steven Grant
If you steal from one author, it’s plagiarism; if you steal from many, it’s research.  — Wilson Mizner
All writing is in fact cut-ups. A collage of words read heard overheard. What else?  — William S. Burroughs
It’s not where you take things from—it’s where you take them to. Jean-Luc Godard
Plagiarism is basic to all culture. — Pete Seeger
Bad artists copy, good artists steal. — Pablo Picasso
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren’t very new at all. — Abraham Lincoln
Those who do not want to imitate anything, produce nothing. — Salvador Dali
So what are you waiting for? Go on, steal... like an artist.